Failure of the Law to Grant Access to Legal Abortion in Chile.

Introduction: In 2017, Chile decriminalized abortion on three grounds: (i) if the pregnant person's life is at risk, (ii) fetal nonviability, and (iii) rape or incest. This multicase study explores the experiences of pregnant people legally entitled to but denied access to legal abortion in Chile. Methods: Through a snowball sampling approach, we recruited adult Chilean residents who sought, were eligible for, and were denied a legal abortion after September 2017. We conducted semistructured interviews with participants to explore their experiences in seeking and being denied legal abortions. We recorded and transcribed the interviews, then coded and analyzed the transcriptions to identify common themes. Results: We identified four women who met the eligibility criteria. The interviews revealed five common themes in their experiences: (i) disparate levels of social support in accessing abortion, (ii) abundant access barriers, (iii) forced pregnancy, (iv) abortion stigma, and (v) a failure of the law to provide access to abortion. Discussion and Health Equity Implications: Although the 2017 law expanded legal access to abortion in Chile, significant barriers remain. Compounded with social stigma, and the socioeconomic disparities in abortion access, pregnant people continue to face insurmountable obstacles in obtaining legal abortions, even when their lives are at risk and the pregnancy is not viable. The state must prioritize equity of access to legal abortions. Future studies should continue to explore the challenges people face accessing legal abortion care to inform strategies to ensure people are able to obtain the quality care that they are legally entitled to.

Pain, Side Effects, and Abortion Experience Among People Seeking Abortion Care in the Second Trimester.

Background: There is limited documentation about pain and side effects associated with dilation and evacuation (D&E) abortion, yet, pain and side effects are important factors that can affect a client's abortion experience. In 2016, Hope Clinic for Women, an independent abortion clinic in Illinois, altered its cervical preparation protocols before D&E to reduce the total time of the abortion process and improve the client experience. This analysis addresses the gap in data on client experience of abortion in the later second trimester by evaluating pain, side effects, and acceptability by gestational age. Methods: Abortion clients obtaining services at the clinic between March 2017 and June 2018 were eligible to participate if they had viable singleton pregnancies of 16-23.6 weeks' gestation, spoke English, and were at least 18 years old. Eligible participants completed a two-part survey about their abortion experience. Results: We found that respondents seeking abortion care at later gestations in the second trimester were more likely to report pain during their abortions. We did not find any association between side effects and gestational age. Conclusion: Although most respondents were prepared for the pain they experienced, some reported experiencing more pain than they expected, and more effective pain relief was commonly reported as a way to improve the service. More research on patient experiences of later abortion is needed, particularly on experiences of pain and options for pain management.

A repeat dose of misoprostol 800 mcg following mifepristone for outpatient medical abortion at 64-70 and 71-77 days of gestation: A retrospective chart review.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of outpatient medical abortion with mifepristone 200 mg and two misoprostol 800 mcg doses at 64-70 and 71-77 days of gestation. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective chart review of medical abortion outcomes among clients with 64-77 day gestations at a Mexico City public clinic between February 2014 and November 2016 who took mifepristone 200 mg followed 24-48 h later by two doses of misoprostol 800 mcg four hours apart (first dose buccally, second dose sublingually). The primary outcome was successful medical abortion, defined as pregnancy expulsion without surgical intervention. We also assessed additional management and visits to other facilities. We compared outcomes by gestational age (64-70 vs 71-77 days). RESULTS: Of 602 charts reviewed, we analyzed 232 and 218 in the respective groups for effectiveness; nearly 25% of clients were lost to follow up. Treatment success occurred in 231 (99.6%, 95% CI 97.6-100%) clients at 64-70 days and 213 (97.7%, 95% CI 94.7-99.3%) clients at 71-77 days (p = 0.11). Ongoing pregnancy occurred in 1 (0.4%, 95% CI 0-2.4%) and 3 (1.4%, 95% CI 0.3-4.0%) clients, respectively (p = 0.36). Two charts from the 71-77 days group documented visits to other facilities: one bleeding concern prior to scheduled follow up and a hemorrhage during an aspiration intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Regimen effectiveness was high at 64-70 and 71-77 days among clients who attended follow up. However, with 25% attrition, it is difficult to draw definitive conclusions about effectiveness and associated safety. IMPLICATIONS: Mifepristone 200 mg followed by two doses of misoprostol 800 mcg four hours apart is a promising medical abortion regimen to improve efficacy in pregnancies from 64-77 days of gestation as compared to regimens with an initial single misoprostol dose. Prospective research is recommended to achieve more robust efficacy estimates.

High fever after sublingual administration of misoprostol for treatment of post-partum haemorrhage: a hospital-based, prospective observational study in Argentina.

OBJECTIVE: To characterise the occurrence of fever (≥38.0°C) after treatment for post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) with sublingual misoprostol 800 mcg in Latin America, where elevated rates of misoprostol's thermoregulatory effects and recipients' increased susceptibility to high fever have been documented. METHODS: A prospective observational study in hospitals in Argentina enrolled consenting women with atonic PPH after vaginal delivery, eligible to receive misoprostol. Corporal temperature was assessed at 30, 60, 90 and 120 min post-treatment; other effects were recorded. The incidence of high fever ≥ 40.0°C (primary outcome) was compared to the rate observed previously in Ecuador. Logistic regressions were performed to identify clinical and population-based predictors of misoprostol-induced fever. RESULTS: Transient shivering and fever were experienced by 75.5% (37/49) of treated participants and described as acceptable by three-quarters of women interviewed (35/47). The high fever rate was 12.2% (6/49), [95% Confidence Interval (CI) 4.6, 24.8], compared to Ecuador's rate following misoprostol treatment (35.6% (58/163) [95% CI 28.3, 43.5], P = 0.002). Significant predictors of misoprostol-induced fever (model dependent) were as follows: pre-delivery haemoglobin < 11.0g/dl, rapid placental expulsion, and higher age of the woman. No serious outcomes were reported prior to discharge. CONCLUSIONS: Misoprostol to treat PPH in Argentina resulted in a significantly lower rate of high fever than in Ecuador, although both are notably higher than rates seen elsewhere. A greater understanding of misoprostol's side effects and factors involved in their occurrence, including genetics, will help alleviate concerns. The onset of shivering may be the simplest way to know if fever can also be expected.

OBJECTIF: Caractériser la survenue de fièvre (≥ 38,0°C) après traitement d'une hémorragie post-partum (HPP) avec du misoprostol sublingual à 800 mcg en Amérique latine, où des taux élevés d'effets thermorégulateurs du misoprostol et une sensibilité accrue des receveurs à une forte fièvre ont été documentés. MÉTHODES: Une étude observationnelle prospective dans des hôpitaux en Argentine a recruté des femmes consentantes atteintes d'HPP atonique après un accouchement vaginal éligibles pour recevoir du misoprostol. La température corporelle a été évaluée 30, 60, 90 et 120 minutes après le traitement; d'autres effets ont été enregistrés. L'incidence d'une fièvre élevée ≥40,0°C (critère principal) a été comparée au taux observé précédemment en Equateur. Des régressions logistiques ont été effectuées pour identifier les prédicteurs cliniques et ceux basés sur la population de la fièvre induite par le misoprostol . RÉSULTATS: Des frissons transitoires et de la fièvre ont été ressentis par 75% (37/49) des participantes traitées et décrits comme acceptables par les trois quarts des femmes interrogées (35/47). Le taux de fièvre élevé était de 12% (6/49), [intervalle de confiance (IC) à 95%: 4,6, 24,8] contre 35,6% en Equateur après traitement au misoprostol (58/163) [IC95%: 28,3, 43,5], p = 0,002). Les prédicteurs significatifs de la fièvre induite par le misoprostol (selon le modèle) étaient: hémoglobine avant l'accouchement <11,0 g/dL, expulsion placentaire rapide et âge plus élevé de la femme. Aucun résultat sévère n'a été signalé avant le sortie d'hôpital. CONCLUSIONS: Le misoprostol pour traiter l'HPP en Argentine a entraîné un taux de fièvre élevée significativement plus bas qu'en Equateur, bien que les taux dans les deux pays soient notablement plus élevés que les taux observés ailleurs. Une meilleure compréhension des effets secondaires du misoprostol et des facteurs impliqués dans leur apparition, y compris la génétique, aidera à atténuer les inquiétudes. L'apparition de frissons peut être le moyen le plus simple de savoir si l'on peut également s'attendre à de la fièvre.

A non-inferiority study of outpatient mifepristone-misoprostol medical abortion at 64-70 days and 71-77 days of gestation.

OBJECTIVES: This open-label non-inferiority study assessed efficacy of a common outpatient medical abortion regimen among people with pregnancies 64-70 days and 71-77 days of gestation. STUDY DESIGN: We defined non-inferiority by a 6% margin of method success. People with intrauterine pregnancies 64-77 days' gestational age by abdominal ultrasound seeking medical abortion at one of eight clinics and met eligibility criteria were offered participation. Consenting participants took mifepristone 200 mg followed 24-48 h later by misoprostol 800 mcg buccally, and returned after one week for provider evaluation and abdominal ultrasound to determine abortion status. Participants recorded medication use, pregnancy expulsion, daily bleeding and pain scores until the one-week follow up. Clinic staff interviewed participants prior to study discharge to assess acceptability. RESULTS: Seven hundred and nineteen participants were enrolled, 393 and 326 in the respective groups. Successful expulsion without surgical intervention was achieved in 92.3% of the earlier gestational age group and 86.7% of the later group (difference in proportions 5.6%, 1-sided 95% CI 9.6). Ongoing pregnancy accounted for 3.6% and 8.7% (p = 0.007) of outcomes, respectively. Participants in the 71-77 day group reported nausea and weakness more frequently. Pain, bleeding and acceptability measures between groups were similar. CONCLUSION: Although the success rate at 71-77 days of gestation was within the non-inferiority margin, we cannot rule out that it is statistically worse than in the previous gestational week. Significantly more ongoing pregnancies in the later group raise concerns about using the regimen at 71-77 days.

Does route matter? Impact of route of oxytocin administration on postpartum bleeding: A double-blind, randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: We assessed the impact of intravenous (IV) infusion versus intramuscular (IM) oxytocin on postpartum blood loss and rates of postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) when administered during the third stage of labor. While oxytocin is recommended for prevention of PPH, few double-blind studies have compared outcomes by routes of administration. METHODS: A double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial was conducted at a hospital in Argentina. Participants were assigned to receive 10 IU oxytocin via IV infusion or IM injection and a matching saline ampoule for the other route after vaginal birth. Blood loss was measured using a calibrated receptacle for a 1-hour minimum. Shock index (SI) was also calculated, based on vital signs measurements, and additional interventions were recorded. Primary outcomes included: the frequency of blood loss ≥500ml and mean blood loss. RESULTS: 239 (IV infusion) and 241 (IM) women were enrolled with comparable baseline characteristics. Mean blood loss was 43ml less in the IV infusion group (p = 0.161). Rates of blood loss ≥500ml were similar (IV infusion = 21%; IM = 24%, p = 0.362). Women in the IV infusion group received significantly fewer additional uterotonics (5%), than women in the IM group (12%, p = 0.007). Women with PPH in the IM group experienced a larger increase in SI after delivery, which may have influenced recourse to additional interventions. CONCLUSIONS: The route of oxytocin administration for PPH prevention did not significantly impact measured blood loss after vaginal birth. However, differences were observed in recourse to additional uterotonics, favoring IV infusion over IM. In settings where IV lines are routinely placed, oxytocin infusion may be preferable to IM injection.

Early abortion with buccal versus sublingual misoprostol alone: a multicenter, randomized trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare efficacy, safety/side effects and acceptability of buccal versus sublingual administration of a misoprostol-only regimen commonly used for early medical abortion. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a randomized trial at six clinics in two Latin American countries. We randomized women seeking early abortion to buccal or sublingual administration of three doses of misoprostol 800 mcg repeated every 3 h. At initial follow-up (7-14 days after misoprostol), we offered women without a complete abortion aspiration or additional misoprostol plus waiting 7 more days. The primary outcome was continuing pregnancy at initial follow-up. Secondary outcomes included continuing pregnancy at final follow-up, incomplete abortion, successful abortion, side effects, acceptability and complications. We analyzed all outcomes as intention to treat. RESULTS: We enrolled 401 women and randomized 202 into the buccal arm and 199 into the sublingual arm. Continuing pregnancy at initial follow-up occurred in 11/201 (5.5%) and 2/189 (1.1%) women, respectively (p=.02). Additional misoprostol at follow-up increased success, defined as complete abortion, from 170/201 (84.6%) to 184/199 (92.5%) in the buccal arm and 165/189 (87.3%) to 177/189 (93.7%) in the sublingual arm. We found no differences by gestational age. Women reported similar acceptability and side effects across groups except for chills and fever, which women using sublingual misoprostol reported more frequently (p<.05). CONCLUSIONS: Sublingual administration was superior to buccal administration in reducing continuing pregnancy risk after a three-dose regimen of 800 mcg misoprostol. Complete abortion rates were comparable across groups, and in both cases, additional misoprostol at follow-up increased success. IMPLICATIONS: If the primary goal is to avoid continuing pregnancy, sublingual administration of misoprostol 800 mcg every 3 h for three doses should be recommended. If chills or fever are a concern and the primary goal is to avoid surgery, buccal administration may be preferable. For either route, additional misoprostol can be given for incomplete abortion or continuing pregnancy.

Intramuscular injection, intravenous infusion, and intravenous bolus of oxytocin in the third stage of labor for prevention of postpartum hemorrhage: a three-arm randomized control trial.

BACKGROUND: Oxytocin for postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) prophylaxis is commonly administered by either intramuscular (IM) injection or intravenous (IV) infusion with both routes recommended equally and little discussion of potential differences between the two. This trial assesses the effectiveness and safety of 10 IU oxytocin administered as IM injection versus IV infusion and IV bolus during the third stage of labor for PPH prophylaxis. METHODS: In two tertiary level Egyptian maternity hospitals, women delivering vaginally without exposure to pre-delivery uterotonics were randomized to one of three prophylactic oxytocin administration groups after delivery of the baby. Blood loss was measured 1 h after delivery, and side effects were recorded. Primary outcomes were mean postpartum blood loss and proportion of women with postpartum blood loss ≥500 ml in this open-label, three-arm, parallel, randomized controlled trial. RESULTS: Four thousand nine hundred thirteen eligible, consenting women were randomized. Compared to IM injection, mean blood loss was 5.9% less in the IV infusion arm (95% CI: -8.5, - 3.3) and 11.1% less in the IV bolus arm (95% CI: -14.7, - 7.8). Risk of postpartum blood loss ≥500 ml in the IV infusion arm was significantly less compared to IM injection (0.8% vs. 1.5%, RR = 0.50, 95% CI: 0.27, 0.91). No side effects were reported in any arm. CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous oxytocin is more effective than intramuscular injection for the prevention of PPH in the third stage of labor. Oxytocin delivered by IV bolus presents no safety concerns after vaginal delivery and should be considered a safe option for PPH prophylaxis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov # NCT01914419 , posted August 2, 2013.

Safety, efficacy and acceptability of outpatient mifepristone-misoprostol medical abortion through 70 days since last menstrual period in public sector facilities in Mexico City.

Extensive evidence exists regarding the efficacy and acceptability of medical abortion through 63 days since last menstrual period (LMP). In Mexico City's Secretariat of Health (SSDF) outpatient facilities, mifepristone-misoprostol medical abortion is the first-line approach for abortion care in this pregnancy range. Recent research demonstrates continued high rates of complete abortion through 70 days LMP. To expand access to legal abortion services in Mexico City (where abortion is legal through 12 weeks LMP), this study sought to assess the efficacy and acceptability of the standard outpatient approach through 70 days in two SSDF points of service. One thousand and one women seeking pregnancy termination were enrolled and given 200 mg mifepristone followed by 800 µg misoprostol 24-48 hours later. Women were asked to return to the clinic one week later for evaluation. The great majority of women (93.3%; 95% CI: 91.6-94.8) had complete abortions. Women with pregnancies ≤ 8 weeks LMP had significantly higher success rates than women in the 9th or 10th weeks (94.9% vs. 90.5%; p = 0.01). The difference in success rates between the 9th and 10th weeks was not significant (90.0% vs. 91.2%; p = 0.71). The majority of women found the side effects (82.9%) and the use of misoprostol (84.4%) to be very acceptable or acceptable. This study provides additional evidence supporting an extended outpatient medical abortion regimen through 10 weeks LMP.

Efficacy and acceptability of a mifepristone-misoprostol combined regimen for early induced abortion among women in Mexico City.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the experience of women receiving mifepristone-misoprostol for early induced abortion in public sector facilities in the Federal District of Mexico City. METHODS: An open-label prospective study was conducted with 1000 pregnant women who sought induced abortion with a pregnancy of up to 63days of gestation, as measured from the date of their last menstrual period. The study was conducted in three public sector healthcare facilities: two secondary level hospitals and one primary care clinic. Women ingested 200mg mifepristone on day 1, followed by 800µg buccal misoprostol 24hours later, and they returned for follow-up on day 8. The primary outcome was complete abortion without recourse to surgical intervention. RESULTS: A total of 971 women received mifepristone-misoprostol and were included in the analysis for efficacy of treatment. The overall efficacy of the combined medical abortion regimen studied was 97.3% (n=945); the success rate did not vary significantly by gestational age (95.9%-100%; P=0.449). Most women (n=922, 95.0%) had a successful induced abortion with only one dose of misoprostol. CONCLUSION: The combined mifepristone and buccal misoprostol regimen was found to be highly effective and acceptable among Mexican women. www.ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00386282.

Medical abortion: a path to safe, high-quality abortion care in Latin America and the Caribbean.

BACKGROUND: Abortion rates in Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) are nearly triple those in Western Europe, due to less use of contraception and highly restrictive abortion laws. Women resort to clandestine and often unsafe methods to end unwanted pregnancies, exposing themselves to the risk of complications and mortality. Medical abortion (MA) presents a safer alternative. OBJECTIVES: To present evidence of MA's contributions to reduced complications, describe strategies to enhance safe MA, and highlight existing barriers to access in LAC, while examining MA's role in newly legal abortion services. RESULTS: Substantial declines in abortion-related morbidity and mortality and lower costs of treating complications are observed in LAC with MA than with other self-induction methods. Telephone hotlines, telemedicine and harm reduction models enhance access to safer abortion and help reduce complication rates by facilitating information on MA's proper use. Misoprostol is registered in most LAC countries, but access is increasingly limited by regulations and cost. CONCLUSION: Despite highly restrictive abortion laws in LAC, MA increases access to safer abortion. Yet, significant barriers remain and much more must be done to enhance use of modern contraceptive and safer abortion methods among women in the region.

Extending outpatient medical abortion services through 70 days of gestational age.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the efficacy and acceptability of medical abortion at 64-70 days from last menstrual period (LMP) and to compare it with the already proven 57-63 days from LMP gestational age range. METHODS: This prospective, comparative, open-label trial enrolled 729 women with pregnancies 57-70 days from LMP requesting abortion at six U.S. clinics. Medical abortions were managed with 200 mg mifepristone and 800 micrograms buccal misoprostol and sites' service delivery protocols. Follow-up visits occurred 7-14 days after mifepristone, with an abortion considered complete if surgical intervention was not performed. Success, ongoing pregnancy, and acceptability rates were compared. RESULTS: A total of 629 cases were analyzable for efficacy. Success rates were similar in the two groups (57-63 days group: 93.5%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 90-96; 64-70 days group: 92.8%, 95% CI 89-95). Ongoing pregnancy rates also did not differ significantly (57-63 days: 3.1%, 95% CI 1.6-5.8; 64-70 days: 3.0%, 95% CI 1.5-5.7). Acceptability was high and similar in both arms, with most women (57-63 days: 87.4%; 64-70 days: 88.3%) reporting that their experience was either very satisfactory or satisfactory. CONCLUSION: Medical abortion with mifepristone and misoprostol in current outpatient settings is an efficacious and acceptable method of ending pregnancies 64-70 days from LMP and can be offered without alteration of existing services. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov, www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00997347. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Treatment of post-partum haemorrhage with sublingual misoprostol versus oxytocin in women receiving prophylactic oxytocin: a double-blind, randomised, non-inferiority trial.

BACKGROUND: Oxytocin, the gold-standard treatment for post-partum haemorrhage, needs refrigeration, intravenous infusion, and skilled providers for optimum use. Misoprostol, a potential alternative, is increasingly used ad hoc for treatment of post-partum haemorrhage; however, evidence is insufficient to lend support to recommendations for its use. This trial established whether sublingual misoprostol is non-inferior to intravenous oxytocin for treatment of post-partum haemorrhage in women receiving prophylactic oxytocin. METHODS: In this double-blind, non-inferiority trial, 31 055 women exposed to prophylactic oxytocin had blood loss measured after vaginal delivery at five hospitals in Burkina Faso, Egypt, Turkey, and Vietnam (two secondary-level and three tertiary-level facilities). 809 (3%) women were diagnosed with post-partum haemorrhage and were randomly assigned to receive 800 mug misoprostol (n=407) or 40 IU intravenous oxytocin (n=402). Providers and women were masked to treatment assignment. Primary endpoints were cessation of active bleeding within 20 min and additional blood loss of 300 mL or more after treatment. Clinical equivalence of misoprostol would be accepted if the upper bound of the 97.5% CI fell below the predefined non-inferiority margin of 6%. All outcomes were assessed from the time of initial treatment. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00116350. FINDINGS: All randomly assigned participants were analysed. Active bleeding was controlled within 20 min after initial treatment for 363 (89%) women given misoprostol and 360 (90%) given oxytocin (relative risk [RR] 0.99, 95% CI 0.95-1.04; crude difference 0.4%, 95% CI -3.9 to 4.6). Additional blood loss of 300 mL or greater after treatment occurred for 139 (34%) women receiving misoprostol and 123 (31%) receiving oxytocin (RR 1.12, 95% CI 0.92-1.37). Shivering (152 [37%] vs 59 [15%]; RR 2.54, 95% CI 1.95-3.32) and fever (88 [22%] vs 59 [15%]; 1.47, 1.09-1.99) were significantly more common with misoprostol than with oxytocin. Six women had hysterectomies and two women died. INTERPRETATION: Misoprostol is clinically equivalent to oxytocin when used to stop excessive post-partum bleeding suspected to be due to uterine atony in women who have received oxytocin prophylactically during the third stage of labour.

Two distinct oral routes of misoprostol in mifepristone medical abortion: a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To study the efficacy, safety, and acceptability of oral immediately swallowed and buccal misoprostol 800 mcg after mifepristone 200 mg for terminating pregnancy through 63 days since the last menstrual period (LMP). METHODS: This seven-site study randomly assigned 966 women seeking abortions to oral or buccal misoprostol 800 mcg 24-36 hours after mifepristone 200 mg with 7-14-day follow-up. RESULTS: Success rates in the oral and buccal groups were 91.3% (389 of 426) and 96.2% (405 of 421), respectively (P=.003; relative risk [RR] 0.95, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.92-0.98). Ongoing pregnancy occurred in 3.5% (15 of 426) of women who took oral misoprostol compared with 1.0% (4 of 421) of women in the buccal group (P=.012; RR 3.71, 95% CI 1.24-11.07). Through 49 days since the LMP, oral and buccal regimens performed similarly, but success with oral misoprostol decreased as pregnancy advanced. In pregnancies of 57-63 days since the LMP, success with oral misoprostol fell below 90%, whereas that with buccal remained high (oral 85.1% [97 of 114], buccal 94.8% [109 of 115], P=.015, RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.82-0.98). Furthermore, in this gestational age group, there were significantly more ongoing pregnancies among women who took misoprostol orally (7.9% [9 of 114]) compared with buccally (1.7% [2 of 115]; P=.029, RR 4.54, 95% CI 1.0-20.55). Adverse effect profiles were similar, although fever and chills were reported approximately 10% more often among women who took buccal misoprostol. Satisfaction and acceptability were high for both methods. CONCLUSION: Buccal misoprostol 800 mcg after mifepristone 200 mg is a good option for medical abortion through 63 days since the LMP. Oral misoprostol 800 mcg is also a safe and effective alternative, although success rates diminish with increasing gestational age. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00386867 LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.

A participatory assessment to identify strategies for improved cervical cancer prevention and treatment in Bolivia

En este trabajo se evalúan la organización y disponibilidad de servicios de prevención y tratamiento del cáncer cervicouterino en cuatro de los nueve departamentos de Bolivia y se identifican estrategias de intervención. De 2001 a 2002 un equipo multidisciplinario de 15 personas llevó a cabo en Bolivia una evaluación que comprendió una revisión bibliográfica sobre el cáncer cervicouterino en el país, entrevistas semiestructuradas con 583 partes interesadas y 56 observaciones de servicios de salud de diversos niveles. En un taller celebrado después del trabajo de campo se reunieron 60 líderes de todos los departamentos del país para revisar los resultados y determinar su prioridad, y para elaborar recomendaciones basadas en las pruebas científicas recaudadas con miras a fortalecer los servicios de prevención del cáncer cervicouterino. Bolivia tiene una de las tasas más altas de cáncer cervicouterino en el mundo. No obstante, no tiene ningún programa organizado ni tampoco ninguna estrategia destinada a lograr que el tamizaje del cáncer cervicouterino alcance una cobertura mínima de 80 por ciento, que es la meta establecida por el Ministerio de Salud y Previsión Social. Una buena parte de la población carece de información sobre los servicios para la prevención y el tratamiento de lesiones precancerosas, o no puede llegar a estos servicios con facilidad. Los proveedores de atención sanitaria en el sector público calculan que de 50 a 80 por ciento de las mujeres sometidas al tamizaje no regresan a su seguimiento porque no hay ningún sistema que garantice un seguimiento adecuado con fines de diagnóstico o tratamiento. Muchos prestadores de atención de salud desconocen que los frotis de Papanicolaou se usan para detectar lesiones precancerosas. Bolivia tiene una unidad establecida dentro del Ministerio de Salud y Previsión Social cuya función es crear, administrar y supervisar programas nacionales para la prevención y el tratamiento del cáncer cervicouterino. Dicha unidad, en coordinación con las autoridades sanitarias en cada uno de los departamentos del país, también busca fortalecer la imposición de normas nacionales, actividades de capacitación, e iniciativas comunitarias de tipo informativo o educativo. No obstante, los servicios de tamizaje no están debidamente vinculados con los de diagnóstico y tratamiento de lesiones precancerosas. Por añadidura, los servicios de diagnóstico y tratamiento no siempre abundan o son accesibles...

The acceptability of self-collected samples for HPV testing vs. the pap test as alternatives in cervical cancer screening.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the acceptability of the self-collection of samples for human papillomavirus (HPV) testing in comparison with that of the Pap test. METHODS: The study population consisted of 1069 women 20 years and older who were eligible for coverage through the Mexican Institute of Social Security (IMSS). These women were randomly selected among participants in a larger study to evaluate the use of HPV testing as an alternative in cervical cancer screening. All participants provided a self-collected vaginal sample for HPV testing according to explicit instructions and underwent a Pap test. Afterwards, each woman was interviewed about her experience and opinion regarding the two procedures. Acceptability was measured by a calculated score based on discomfort, pain, embarrassment, privacy, perception of personal treatment during the Pap test, and understanding of how to perform the self-sampling method. RESULTS: Ninety-three percent of women experienced sufficient privacy with the Pap test, whereas 98% of women reported that privacy with the self-sampling procedure was acceptable. The Pap test consistently provoked more discomfort, pain, and embarrassment than self-sampling. Sixty-eight percent of the women who indicated a test preference chose self-sampling. Preference for this method was positively associated with monthly household income. Women reported a preference for self-sampling because it is more comfortable (71.2%) and causes less embarrassment (55.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Self-sampling is more acceptable than the Pap test and could improve coverage rates of early detection programs. The incorporation of self-collected samples to detect HPV could encourage participation in screening programs among those women who reject the Pap test because of the necessary pelvic examination.